I missed this while I was in Germany but thank goodness it's being shown in a couple of theaters as the Oscars draw near. The Hurt Locker brings the terrifying adrenaline rush of disarming bombs to the forefront of wartime commentary. Sgt William James (Jeremy Renner) joins a small bomb tech unit (or whatever the correct lingo might be, I will not pretend to know anything at all about the military) composed of just him, Sanborn (Anthony Mackie), and Eldridge (Brian Geraghty). At first Will's overconfidence and careless attitude frustrate and alienate his team, but as they suffer several harrowing near-death experiences together, they come to understand him a bit better. He is level-headed and loyal in a pinch, and extremely dedicated to his job. He worries about his son and ex-wife at home, but worries more about how to handle himself when he isn't working. Their 38 days with together are documented in short conversational shots and fraught, extended field scenes, producing an intricate story both frightening and inviting.
The more I think about this movie, the more impressed I am with how much complexity the filmmakers express with so little explanatory dialogue. It's a really thought-out film, mixing the thrill of major bombs going off with the reality of who's getting killed by them. The Hurt Locker respects the audience's intelligence, letting us make out for ourselves exactly what sort of man Will is, and why he does what he does. In the midst of all the explosions and gunfire, it's a decidedly nuanced character study. I felt I understood the three central figures in absence of many real in-depth "getting-to-know-you" type of conversations. The excellent performances expounded upon these characters, with Renner and Mackie grounding the whole film; both exude fiery and layered personalities which play off each other interestingly. I liked Geraghty a lot too, finding his scared and unsure Eldridge the most sympathetic.
It'd be great if Bigelow was nominated for this, not only because it'd be nice if a 4th woman in history received an Oscar nomination for Best Director, but because it's really well-directed. She's amazing at creating incredibly tense moments- I was anxiously holding my breath quite a few times, and would probably resort to nail-biting if it didn't gross me out. She breaks the story up into a lot of slightly disjointed, but linear, scenes, each carefully composed to show another aspect of war's effects on both soldiers and citizens. And for once there's effective use of slow-motion (which usually I only enjoy for the corny factor).
The Hurt Locker is an exciting, engaging, depressing, and intelligent film about the simultaneous addictions and horrors caused by war. Normally I'm not into war movies, but this is just really, honestly good.
4.5/5
Saturday, January 2, 2010
The Hurt Locker (2009)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Great review. As you know, I'm a big fan of this flick.
ReplyDeleteI REALLY need to see this one...
ReplyDeleteI'm a huge fan of The Hurt Locker and you've done an outstanding review of the film.
ReplyDeleteAnyone might be turned off by this film since it shows Jeremy Renner's character as someone who feels invincible, so to speak. However, I really adored the approach taken by the script. In fact, it tries to show in a balance way two things: 1) the fear that war can cast in some soldiers' mind (ex: Sanborn and Eldridge) and 2) the perception of war as a "drug" (ex: James). Besides, it's one of the few war films that actually made feel I was in the story.
ReplyDeleteFinally, I hope it will get a lot of nominations at the next Oscars.
I must say The Hurt Locker is an extremely unrealistic film. Although I can see why Bigelow choose to that way, it's disappointing that she has to sacrifice realism for the sake of entertainment.
ReplyDeleteOK Castor, I'll bite - what makes it unrealistic?
ReplyDeletehaha Hatter I'm glad you said something. I have no idea what would make a story about soldiers in Iraq "realistic", so I wasn't sure how to respond. I think Boal's script was based on his experiences as a journalist working with a bomb squad in Iraq, so that led me to believe it was fairly realistic. But I'm not positive.
ReplyDelete@ Mad and Alex: Well, both the situations and the behavior of the main character SSgt James are extremely unlikely to happen in real life. EOD teams do not travel around town all by themselves especially when there is only 3 members in the entire team. In real situations, they would be escorted by a larger unit, at least a platoon of grunts. The US military simply doesn't venture outside the large bases in anything less than that. You see Sanborn and Eldridge trying to secure literally two city blocks all by themselves while James goes to work, it makes for great thrilling entertainment but in real life, this would never happen. The escort would fan out and provide a safe perimeter so the EOD team can go to work. And come on, 3 EOD bubbas venturing alone into an hostile city to chase suspected bombers in the middle of the night LOL
ReplyDeleteI guess this is not the place to write something to lengthy but I wrote a review a couple weeks ago that points out the main issues about this.
http://www.anomalousmaterial.com/movies/2010/01/the-hurt-locker-2009/