Monday, April 11, 2011

Dune (1984)

Ah fuck, is it time to talk about Dune now? (Side note: As a reaction against being denied press status to IFF Boston, despite getting it last year, I've decided to cuss more often around here. Yeah. Shit.) I'd been warned against David Lynch's ill-fated adaptation of Frank Herbert's notoriously complex, influential sci-fi novel (which I haven't read), but its position on the sci-fi list and my own gross curiosity finally led to a viewing. Set in a distant future or an alternate universe or something, Dune concerns the political schemings and drug wars of two powerful clans, each in charge of a planet fiefdom under the emperor. The Atreides family takes over the desert planet Arrakis, valuable because it is the only place to find "spice", a mind-altering substance that essentially powers all society with its many uses.

The family's rivals the Harkonnen invade Arrakis, wanting to control the production of spice for themselves. Paul Atreides (Kyle MacLachlan), the son of the Atreides leader, escapes their attack and spends years in the desert with the Arrakis native people known as Fremen, gaining increased mental powers from spice and fulfilling a prophecy for a superbeing who would lead them to freedom. The emperor gets in on the action, as does a group of witchy magic ladies. Oh, and Sting's there.

Jesus christ what the hell is happening here? I can't even... Ok. To begin with, I'm not the biggest David Lynch supporter, essentially because Blue Velvet freaked me the fuck out in high school (I liked Mulholland Drive, though). With Dune, he takes a lot of his self-indulgent, convoluted storytelling tendencies and applies them to an already complicated narrative, all while making it ridiculously campy and nonsensical.

For the most part, this movie is just a complete mess. The story is all over the place, most of the characters are flat and undeveloped, the effects aren't quite up to Lynch's vision, the whole set up is super patriarchal, half the characters are unnecessary, and it's too damned long. Also, here is a director who can't really shoot action scenes in an interesting manner. Miles wisely advised me to read the wikipedia article about the book, so I'd have some grounding, and thank goodness I did since there isn't much effective explanation of anything. A huge amount of information had to be condensed into one film, which seems like a stupid idea to me. I guess that's why they later made it a miniseries.

Of course, it does have its entertaining moments. The large amount of repetitive thought narration is continually hilarious, and does not help explain the story better, as I imagine was the intention. The acting is pretty bad, but I do really enjoy Kyle MacLachlan in anything, and I appreciated that Sting barely had any lines but did get to wear completely awesome underwear (although his nipples seem weirdly small). There are some cool sets and costumes, and I dug the sandworms.

I'm not even sure what to think of Dune. It's not very good. But I can't say I hated it. I suppose it's mostly just sort of funny, and awfully misadvised; this makes it persistently watchable, like some sort of horrific train wreck with bouncy balls or something. Also it led to this joke that I helped with.

2/5

Pair This Movie With: Well if you want a night of cheesy sci-fi that rips off Star Wars, there's always Starcrash.

8 comments:

  1. Neither Lynch nor Sting in a metal codpiece can save this one.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh well, you know, Im a huge Dune fan, Im currently on the fourth nove of the series "God Emperor of Dune" and I love the whole universe to death.

    The thing with Lynchs film is that it was taken from him by the studio and edited in the way they wanted. He personally disowns the film, hates it to death.

    I enjoy simply because it attempts to bring these characters that I read about to life. And to be honest, Lynch's film is actually faithful to the book, but when youve read it, you feel like you are watching a fastforwarded version of the novel.

    I do enjoy its art direction and wardrobes, its obviously an expensive film. I wonder what it would have turned out like had Lynch been given the chance to finish it his way.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Alexa: Yeah, it's too bad, really.

    Connoisseur: I haven't read the books yet, but I'm definitely planning on at least reading the first one to get a feel for the series. I know the film was fiddled around with and I'm not blaming Lynch for all of its issues, though the fact that I'm not a big fan of his to begin with made me a little prejudice!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yeah... I like Lynch but neither Dune or Blue Velvet did much for me... prefer Eraserhead and Wild at Heart.

    I have some photos in a book somewhere of Salvador Dali and H.R. Giger sitting together while they were collaborating on the conceptual art for a version of Dune which was going to be shot by Jodorosky... now that's a film I wish had got made!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nuts4r2: I would have loved to see that version happen, Jodorowsky has said that he was so depressed on the day that Lynchs DUNE premiered, but slowly, as the film progressed, he felt happier and happier...

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with the Connoisseur. The only way to take any real enjoyment out of this film is to already know the books intimately.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I loved this film for a while at Uni, it was such an usual sci-fi movie, so grand and on a huge scale.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I still haven't seen this. Shame on me.

    ReplyDelete